Book Review: The People in the Room: Rabbis, Nuns, Pastors, Popes, and Presidents - Sir James Rudin

Rabbi James Rudin’s book was previously reviewed by our Journal of Ecumenical Studies in Volume 57, which can be accessed HERE. Rabbi Rudin is also Sir James Rudin because he was honored by Pope Francis in 2022 with the Papal Knighthood of St. Gregory the Great for his decades of work building positive Catholic-Jewish relations worldwide. We are delighted to provide a second review of this important book by Joseph Stoutzenberger, Professor Emeritus, Holy Family University, Philadelphia, PA.

James Rudin (with contributions from David Rosen, Marvin R. Wilson, and Mary C. Boys), The People in the Room: Rabbis, Nuns, Pastors, Popes, and Presidents. Mesa, AZ: iPub Global Connection, 2022. Pp. 282. $21.99, paper; $12.99, Kindle. Visit the publishers’s website HERE.

In this book, Rabbi Rudin tells the story of Jewish-Christian relations since the 1960s. As Interreligious Director of the American Jewish Committee for thirty-two years, he is best suited to tell that story. His life before taking that position prepared him for his involvement with Christians. He grew up among Southern Baptists in Alexandria, Virginia. He later served as a chaplain in the United States Air Force, where he regularly interacted with Christian chaplains and service members of all denominations. His book provides an insider’s view of the major questions and crises faced by Jews and Christians during this period of groundbreaking developments in ecumenical relations.

Each chapter offers a relatively brief account of a particular incident in Jewish-Christian relations over the past sixty years and of the author’s pivotal role in addressing the problems and progress in relation to the incident. While he brings a gentle touch to his descriptions of the people involved, he is not afraid to speak the truth when hurtful misrepresentations exist. He has much to say about developments in Catholic teaching on Judaism following the 1965 Vatican Council II document, Nostra Aetate, which rejected the Antisemitism inherent in Catholic teachings. Rudin points out that, even afterward, the Catholic Church still demonstrated insensitivity, such as when a document on the Holocaust declared that some Christians collaborated with the Nazi agenda while others opposed it as if there were equal numbers on both sides.

This book is a memoir with substance. As the title suggests, during over thirty pivotal years, he was there in the room where Jews and Christians addressed issues between them, in particular when Christian groups misunderstood and misrepresented Judaism in often unintentional but hurtful ways. Rudin was a voice of sensitivity and common sense in whatever gathering he found himself, such as when a group was designing a nondenominational chapel at Camp David, and all the others thought nothing of having all but one stained-glass window depicting Christian themes. When a group of well-meaning Carmelite nuns built a monastery on the grounds of the concentration camp at Auschwitz, Rudin was instrumental in getting the monastery moved to a nearby location. He led a group to eliminate antisemitic tropes in the famous Oberammergau Passion Play and spoke out against Mel Gibson’s film, The Passion of the Christ, in which Jews are presented as the evil ones while Jesus is being sadistically tortured. Rudin met with evangelical Christian leader Billy Graham, who was overheard discussing with President Nixon how Jews control the media in America—resulting in Graham’s apologizing for his insensitivity and misstatements. He worked with Mainline Protestants as well as Black Christian leaders, all of whom had different issues to deal with in their perspectives on Jews and Judaism.

This book cannot be read today without thinking about the current crisis between Israel and Palestine. Rudin did speak about the times years ago when he challenged Mainline Protestants who were critical of Israel but without addressing government policies. Concerned people today are trying to navigate how to bring peace to a region where conflicting interests collide and when criticism of the government is not necessarily antisemitism but, rather, a search for peace and justice serving the best interests of both groups. Rudin’s book offers insight into how differing groups can meet and talk in openness and goodwill. His book is a chronicle of the years he spent doing just that.

Joseph Stoutzenberger, Professor Emeritus, Holy Family University, Philadelphia, PA

James Rudin’s book was also featured in Dialogue Institute program in 2022 - see below.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

FEATURED JES AUTHOR: NETTA SCHRAMM ON "A DIALOGUE OF DIFFERENCE"

The 59.1 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available! For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes a full-text PDF version of their article available for 30 days on Project Muse. In this issue, we feature Netta Schramm’s "Dialogue of Difference.” A full-text PDF version of the article can be accessed HERE.

Netta Schramm is a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for the Study of Conversion and Inter-Religious Encounters at Ben Gurion University of the Negev. She received a B.Sc. and an M.A. from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where she submitted her dissertation titled “Sound Beliefs: A Performative Approach to the Thought of Irving Greenberg, Ovadia Yosef, and Yeshayahu Leibowitz.”

Schramm was a Minerva Fellow at Ludwig Maximillians Universität, Munich, 2019–21. Among her publications are: “Are You My Rabbi? Yitz Greenberg’s Intellectual Biography in Kuhnian Terms” (Modern Judaism 43:3) and “Radical Translation as Transvaluation: From Tsene-Rene to The Jews Are Coming: Three Readings of Korah's Rebellion” (PaRDeS 25).


Is a “dialogue of difference” merely another term for “two monologues”?

I believe not. The purpose of this dialogue approach is mutual understanding. Therefore, in its ideal state, such dialogue would allow require participants to refine and sharpen their own viewpoints, while also recognizing the points of disagreement with their conversation partner. This cognitive effort would cultivate mutual respect without any expectation for agreement.


Why do you find the reading of Liebowitz’s affect, beyond the interview transcript, so significant?

In 1916, Ferdinand de Saussure criticized an ingrained misconception of spoken language and derided linguists who focus on written texts: “It is rather as if people believed that to find out what a person looks like, it is better to study his photograph than his face.” Indeed, the performative event, bodily gestures, intonation, and tempo all have significant semiotic value. A close reading of a video presentation allows one to notice gaps between what is being said and how it is being said, a gap that cannot be deduced from a written transcript. [NOTE: Scroll down to view a video excerpt.]


What do you think those interested in interfaith dialogue — as advocates or critics — can learn from the encounter between Leibowitz and Dubois?

The dialogue between Leibowitz and Dubois is a fascinating case of two people engaged in dialogue with different aims in mind. Perhaps “dialogue of difference” can offer advocates of interfaith dialogue a new notion of “anti-dialogue” that can refresh their activity. For critics of interfaith dialogue, a “dialogue of difference” can serve as a more enticing form of interfaith communication scheme because it focuses on defining what is different rather than bridging theological or normative gaps.

How did you get interested in the topic?

As a student of modern Jewish thought, I have dealt extensively with the Jewish-Christian dialogue since Vatican II. I am also engaged in offering hermeneutical tools for reading audio and audio-visual texts in the contexts of modern and contemporary thought and philosophy. Thus, I employed my methodology on the filmed Lebowitz-Dubois exchange and offered a new formulation of Leibowitz’s theory of dialogue.


What is your next project? 1-3 sentences

I am working on a book project titled “Icon and Iconoclast: the intellectual biography of Yeshayahu Leibowitz.”


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

UNESCO Art Camp and Dialogue 2024 at Temple University Rome

This video piece was created by Alina Vasieikina - @alina_vasie on Instagram.

The UNESCO Art Camp and Dialogue program at Temple University Rome kicked off with a whirl of creativity, connection, and meaningful discussions. A diverse group of artists converged, armed with their art supplies and a passion for fostering intercultural dialogue. Around half of the group were Italian-born artists and the others were living as refugees in Italy or other European countries. The program provided a platform for participants to express their artistic talents while exploring important themes of identity, bias, and leadership.

The program commenced with a vibrant start as participants received their art supplies and savored a delicious breakfast at a local cafe. Fueled by energy and anticipation, the group gathered to embark on an enlightening journey. Dr. Andi Laudisio, Dr. David Krueger, and Sergio Mazza from the Dialogue Institute, UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador Hedva Ser, and Artistic Director Jean Michel Armengol set the stage with an introductory session on intercultural dialogue. The lecture prompted thought-provoking discussions, laying the foundation for the coming days.

Over the next week, we saw art become a vehicle for dialogue as participants engaged in various workshops. Following the workshops, the group engaged in a dialogue on identity and asked important questions like “How is identity created?” and “How is identity shifted during migration?”. Through this profoundly engaging session, we explored the shared experiences between immigrants and individuals within their home country when faced with the effects of migration. The day was a stepping stone towards bridge-building and lasting connections among the participants.

The creative process seamlessly intertwined with structured and informal dialogues, creating an immersive and enriching experience for everyone involved. Special guest, Ms. Lydia Ruprecht from UNESCO, added her invaluable insights to the workshops and joined the participants for a memorable dinner ceremony.

At the end of the program, participants shared their artwork, performances, and creative pieces during a public exhibition at Temple University’s Rome campus, hosted by Dean Emilia Zankina. During the closing ceremony, all participants received “Global Dialogue Through Art” certificates and digital badges from Temple University’s Office of Noncredit and Continuing Education.

The 2024 UNESCO Art Camp and Dialogue program has been a wonderful collaboration among the Andorran National Commission for UNESCO with the support of the Italian National Commission for UNESCO, Assistant Director General of UNESCO for Education, Ms. Stefania Giannini, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Rome, UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador for Cultural Diplomacy, Madam Hedva Ser, Dr. Amid Ismail, Dean, and Laura H. Carnell, Professor, Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry, and our team of facilitators from the Dialogue Institute in Philadelphia. The program has provided a space for artistic exploration, dialogue, and connection. Funding was provided by The Enlightened World Foundation, a long-time supporter of the Dialogue Institute.

Meet the Artists

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Exciting Projects Under Way and Opportunities Await in 2024

We are thrilled to unveil the exciting projects that will shape the upcoming season!

As an organization committed to fostering dialogue, understanding, and cultural exchange, these initiatives represent our dedication to creating meaningful connections and transformative experiences.

Global Dialogue Through Art

One of our standout projects is the UNESCO Art Camp and Dialogue: Roma 2024, supported by the Enlightened World Foundation.

Amid wars in various parts of the world and the controversial political debates on immigration and refugees, a bright candle will be lit at Temple University Rome, where 19 junior artists who have sought refuge in Europe and who represent countries such as Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, will join artists from Italy and Andorra, to share and learn from each other’s experiences and perspectives on humanity through art and oral dialogue skills that will be developed during the week-long camp. Dialogue Institute staff members will spend the week with the artists to provide dialogue training and facilitate conversations.

This program was envisioned by Dialogue Institute board member Amid Ismail and is a partnership between the Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University - Rome, and UNESCO.  

Mapping Spaces of Meaning

Temple University’s Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity, Advocacy, and Leadership (IDEAL) has joined with us to implement the Mapping Spaces of Meaning Project, which engages Temple students in an initiative to identify sacred spaces on and near Temple’s North Philadelphia campus that speak to diverse identities and spiritual life. The project aims to foster meaningful dialogue on campus and build bridges across religious and cultural differences. Students will create a digital map and share their findings at a public event in April.

Summer Institute on Religious Diversity and Democracy in the U.S.

We are pleased to announce the continuation of our Study of the U.S. Institutes (SUSI) program on religious diversity and democracy this summer, a flagship initiative that aims to foster cross-cultural understanding and equip students for leadership in their home countries of Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, India, and Indonesia. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, Study of the U.S. Institutes program, SUSI Summer 2024 provides an immersive experience through interactive sessions, site visits, and networking opportunities. This program is designed to empower young leaders to make a positive impact in their communities and promote global cooperation.

Dialogue and Human Rights

On January 31st, Executive Director David Krueger delivered a presentation on human rights, democracy, and peacebuilding at the Peace Islands Institute New Jersey. Topics covered included why open conversations are vital, when they're most impactful, and the techniques to effectively employ them in peacebuilding endeavors.


Democracy and Diversity Tour for a European Delegation

Dr. Krueger led a religious diversity and democracy history tour for a group of 18 European leaders who were part of the U.S. State Department’s International Visitor Leadership Program. The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia brought the group to us, including mayors, parliament members, journalists, and other government officials from across the continent. The walking tour used the story of Philadelphia’s religious diversity during the founding period to open up a conversation about national identity, public history, and the challenges and opportunities of life in diverse democracies.

As the Dialogue Institute ushers in the new season, we invite you to follow our journey and connect with us! To learn more about each project and how to get involved, visit the provided links:

Stay tuned for more updates!


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

2023 Book Review Roundup: Journal of Ecumenical Studies

As 2023 comes to a close, we are happy to report that the Journal of Ecumenical Studies reviewed 14 books this year! We had a great selection of important interreligious and ecumenical works highlighting the diversity of the fields in 2023. 


Our year started with Eugene Fisher reviewing Fred Lazin’s book American Christians and the National Interreligious Task Force on Soviet Jewry: A Call to Conscience, published by Rowman & Littlefield.

Read it here: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890324.  

 

Glenn B. Siniscalchi reviewed David Bentley Hart's That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell, and Universal Salvation, published by Yale University Press, commenting that “This book is a mesmerizing defense of the claim that everyone will freely submit to the Christian God…” Read it here: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890325

 

Seth Ward reviewed Susanne Scholz’s and Santiago Slabodsky’s edited volume, The New Diaspora and the Global Prophetic: Engaging the Scholarship of Marc H. Ellis, published by Lexington Books/Fortress Press. Review: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890326 

 

"The supreme value of the book is Kasimow’s remarkable gift of self-portraiture.” Peter A. Huff reviewed Harold Kasimov’s book Love or Perish: A Holocaust Survivor's Vision for Interfaith Peace, published by iPub Global Connection.

Read it now at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890328. 

 

Jonathan C. Friedman reviewed Peace and Faith: Christian Churches and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict by Cary Nelson and Michael C. Gizzi and published by Academic Studies Press. The review is available here at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890327.

 

Journal of Ecumenical Studies co-editor David Krueger reviewed Philip Gorski and Samuel Perry’s book The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy, published by Oxford University Press. Check it out at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/890329  

 

Our summer edition included three reviews, starting with Joseph Loya’s review of Catholics without Rome: Old Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, and the Reunion of Negotiations of the 1870s by Bryn Geffert and Leroy Boerneke and published by the University of Notre Dame Press. Available now at at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/902009 

 

“What is most interesting about this impressive, multi-authored volume is its genuinely ‘catholic’ character.” – Robert Nicastro in his review of Marc Pugliese and John Becker’s Process Thought and Roman Catholicism: Challenges and Promises published by the University of Pennsylvania Press. Read it now at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/902010 

 

Eugene Fisher reviewed Teaching the Shoah: Mandate and Momentum by Zev Garber and Kenneth L. Hanson for @CamScholars. You can read it on our ProjectMUSE at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/902011!  

 

We finished the year strong with 5 reviews in our winter edition! Zev Garber returned with a reviews of @RMikva’s Interreligious Studies: An Introduction published by @CambPressAsses Read it here: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/914311

 

Zev Garber additionally reviewed Kenneth Hanson’s Luke: Illuminating the Sage of Galilee for @centergcrr.

Read it at the JES now! https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/914312 

 

“This book is an emotive and critical reflection by Jewish and Christian clergy and academics on To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven (TDW)” Zev Garber’s review of From Confrontation to Covenantal Partnership: Jews and Christians on Orthodox Rabbinic Statement of "To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven Read it hear at: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/914313 

 

Nathan Maroney reviewed A Handbook on the Jewish Roots of the Christian Faith by @DrCraigAEvans and David Mishkin, published by @hendricksonpub.

Available to read now at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/914315

 

Finally, Zev Garver also reviewed The Nun in the Synagogue: Judeocentric Catholicism in Israel by Emma O'Donnell Polyakov for @PSUPress.

You can access it like all other reviews on our ProjectMUSE at https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/914314 


We had a great selection of books and are excited to see what 2024’s releases offer. If you are interested in reviewing a book with the JES, visit https://dialogueinstitute.org/book-reviews for more information and our recommendations of books to review. See you in 2024!

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: So Jung Kim on "Speaking In-Between: Vernacular Spirituality of a Woman in Late Chosǒn Korea"

The Fall Issue 58.4 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available! For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes a full-text PDF version of their article available for 30 days on Project Muse. In this issue, we are featuring So Jung Kim’s "Speaking In-Between: Vernacular Spirituality of a Woman in Late Chosǒn Korea." A full-text PDF version of the article can be accessed HERE.

So Jung Kim (Presbyterian Church, USA) is the Associate for Theology in the Office of Theology and Worship of the Presbyterian Mission Agency, PCUSA. She has a Ph.D. (2021) from the University of Chicago (IL) Divinity School. Her entries on James Cone and Womanist Theology are included in Charles Taliaferro and Elsa J. Marty, eds., A Dictionary of Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. She has published a reflection on liturgy during the pandemic in Call to Worship: Liturgy, Music, Preaching, and the Arts and a book review for the International Review of Mission. She has taught as an adjunct at McCormick Theological Seminary, Chicago, and in her present position, teaches and resources Presbyterian constituents in local, national, and global settings.

She has presented at workshops and panels in several settings in the U.S., including, most recently, the 2023 Parliament of the World’s Religions in Chicago. Ordained as a Minister of Word and Sacrament in the Presbyterian Church (USA), her research interests involve several forms of theology, anthropology, Korean Christianity, and ecumenism.


In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

In my scholarly exploration, I examine the transcultural and transhistorical ramifications of ordinary language usage on Christian spirituality. The focal point of my analysis is the case of Yi Suni, a Korean female martyr. I posit that Yi Suni’s employment of sermo humilis, a literary style historically linked with Augustine, signifies a Spirit-inspired influence independent of Western missionary involvement. While prior research has addressed Yi Suni’s dual identity as a Confucian woman and a Catholic, I underscore the significance of scrutinizing her linguistic expressions, particularly evident in her letters, to understand better the challenges she faced within her transcultural milieu.

How does your reading of Yi Suni’s letters from prison help us to see her as more than a “virgin martyr” as typically understood among Korean Catholics?

In the ensuing section of this exposition, my attention is directed toward the spiritual dimensions of sermo humilis within Yi Suni’s correspondence penned on her deathbed letters. I delve into the intricate interplay between Confucian and Christian virtues, as evident in her writings. The discussion navigates through Yi Suni’s intricate negotiation of her conflated identity as a Confucian daughter and a Christian virgin martyr. I highlight the nuanced perspective that the contemporary emphasis on her ascetic life as a virgin martyr might present an incomplete portrayal of who she is – still, a filial daughter and a wife in a Confucian society.

In scrutinizing the text, I aim to unravel the multifaceted aspects of her identity, the messages conveyed therein, and how she grapples with the complexities of her era in a nuanced way. In the West, people tend to be classified into rigid religious categories such as Christian or Confucian.

What can Yi Suni’s story teach us about the fluidity of religious identities? 

The emergence of stringent religious categorizations in the modern Westernized world can be attributed not merely to “the West,” but specifically to its colonial and imperial impact. This influence has, in turn, engendered diverse forms of religious conflicts in the world under Western colonial influence. Yi Suni’s correspondence marks an early instance of this modern religious inclination, albeit an independent attempt to choose Catholicism with agency. However, despite the agency, her letters illustrate the inherent challenge in the notion of being committed to one religion between religious identities. The reality reflected in the letters underscores the coexistence of multiple religious affiliations within an individual’s identity and contextual framework.

I pose the question of whether the compelling force of Western religion, which necessitates choosing one religious identity over another, may engender confusion and potentially violate one’s choice to remain who she is in between more than two languages, cultures, and religions. Simultaneously, I wonder whether the possibility that acknowledging the fluidity of religious identities could alleviate such inner turmoil. Yi Suni’s utilization of diglossic vernacular language in her letters serves as a manifestation of this struggle, highlighting the complexity inherent in navigating diverse religious influences within her identity. However, we are still left with “what if?”

How did you get interested in the topic?

My academic journey has been centered on exploring various facets of Christianity and its global trajectory, encompassing both theoretical and practical dimensions. This led me to complete a doctoral dissertation at the University of Chicago, Divinity School, which delves into the transformation of everyday language use in Christian religiosity and spirituality, examining its evolution within transhistorical and transcultural contexts. During this research journey, I encountered Yi Suni’s letters, which became a focal point in a chapter of my dissertation.

What is your next project?

As for my next project, I am developing my doctoral dissertation into a comprehensive book. This endeavor aims to serve as a foundational theory aligned with future works, contributing to academic discourse and offering valuable insights to religious communities in the diaspora.

Furthermore, my ongoing research expands into the intricate tapestry of Christianity as a religion and its spiritual practices. I explore how it integrates cultural, ethnic, and diasporic elements, focusing on the intersections of nationality, racial-ethnic identity, gender, and sexuality. This exploration is grounded in the understanding that these intersecting factors shape the lived, everyday experiences of individuals within the Asian diaspora. The resonance of these experiences extends across the transcultural and transnational journey of Christianity, manifesting on local, national, and global scales.

Thank you, Dr. Kim!

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Effiong Joseph Udo on Dialogue and Democracy in Africa

The Summer Issue 58.3 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days on Project Muse. In this issue, we are featuring Effiong Joseph Udo's "A Reimagination of Dialogue and Democracy in Africa via an Afrocentric Reading of the Parable of the Sower (Lk. 8:4–8)." A full-text version of the article can be accessed HERE.

Effiong Joseph Udo, Ph.D., currently teaches New Testament Literature, Hermeneutics, and Dialogue at the Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. He is president of The Pan-African Dialogue Institute and director at the Centre for Deep Dialogue and Critical Thinking at the same University. His doctoral thesis on St Luke’s soteria (salvation) concept grounded his understanding of the ministry of Jesus as a spirit-filled campaign for prioritization of justice and human well-being in the society of his days. This inspired Dr. Udo’s research interests in biblical exegesis to promote social justice, human rights, peacebuilding, interfaith relations, as well as ecumenism.

He is an Ambassador for Peace of the Universal Peace Federation, New York, a member of Professors World Peace Academy, as well as a postdoctoral International dialogue fellow of King Abdullah Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID), Vienna, Austria.


In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

In the article, I attempted to show how a pan-Africanist reading of the Second Testament Parable of the Sower in Lk. 8:4–8 informs a reimagination of dialogue and democracy in Africa. The study suggests that dialogue and democracy—which are ethically guided by the principles of equality, tolerance, cooperation, participation, and inclusion—are, in practice, complementary and mutually reinforcing, and these widely embraced values are present in African social systems, such as the ethics of communalism and ubuntu.

Many observers have characterized democracy as a Western import to African societies, but you have shown that many values and practices in traditional African societies are deeply democratic. What can democracies in Europe and North America learn from democratic African societies?

Guided by the lived ethics of ubuntu and communalism, Africans are socially and culturally oriented in values toward relationships, friendship, hospitality, cooperation, and tolerance of ‘the other’. I recommend that sustained efforts must be made by all stakeholders to deepen the knowledge and practice of these values in order to strengthen democratic engagements in Africa, Europe, North America, and other democratic societies in the world.

How did you get interested in the topic?

The African Union 2063 Agenda track on peace and democracy motivated my research. I sought to understand the presence, nature, and effects of civil society organizations’ engagements with African states and people to promote peace, human rights, and democratic ideals in the continent. I hoped that the effort would help in widening the Dialogue Institute’s contributions to deepening democratic ideals of freedom through its scholarship in dialogue and training in religious pluralism and democracy around the world. Working with Dr. David Krueger as a dialogue consultant for Africa with the Dialogue Institute, I also thought the Institute would be enriched by the exchange of experiences and perspectives of Africa’s traditional, academic, political, and religious leaders, youth, women, professional groups, and institutions because their dialogue and peacebuilding engagements are directed toward the African Renaissance.

In a few sentences, can you describe how the articles in this issue of the JES connect to the vision for The Pan-African Dialogue Institute?

It is remarkable that the project also gave birth to The Pan-African Dialogue Institute. In the course of my travels, I was able to bring together colleagues, civic leaders, and professionals in various disciplines, as well as youth and women’s groups from a number of African countries; and together we created The Pan-African Dialogue Institute. One could learn more by visiting: www.africadialogue.org. So far, members of the new institute include people from 18 African countries, and this number is still growing. Some individuals who had been on the DI African contacts, including the Study of the U.S. Institute on Religious Pluralism alumni, have also joined the Institute. Part of the rationale for creating the Institute was to serve the DI Board with a central body to relate with whenever Africa is on the agenda. 

I believe that the creation of The Pan-African Dialogue Institute represents a significant milestone for the DI under the leadership of Dr. Krueger as well as a lasting testimony of Prof. Leonard Swidler’s inspiration. It flows from Swidler’s mentorship and encouragement to Dr. Mutombo Nkulu-N’Sengha, founder of the DI-supported Bumuntu Peace Institute in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and my humble self of the University of Uyo in Nigeria to unite African scholars and professionals to embrace dialogue. This is why the Institute will remain in constant collaboration with the Dialogue Institute at Temple University. Created to foster multi-sectoral dialogue on issues in religion, culture, sciences, environment, law, economy, information, communications, technology, gender, and politics that promote democratic ideals and human rights in the Continent, and so on, the Institute is established as a civil society think tank. It seeks to unite African professionals and leaders to promote dialogue engagement that is rooted in Pan-Africanism and contribute to the building of policies and practices for the sustainable development of Africa. African professionals who are based in the continent and in the diaspora, from any field of life, as well as friends of Africa are welcome to join us; for dialogue is at its best in company, and not in isolation. 


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

A SUSI Reflection By Samaa Hossam (Sky)

The journey of SUSI 2023 began as a mere adventure into a new land, but it quickly evolved into a soul-enriching exploration of five different countries that the participants represent in the program. The friendships that blossomed amidst our diverse backgrounds mirrored the very essence of our theme. Bonds forged through shared laughter, late-night conversations, and mutual respect transcended our differences and became a testament to the possibility of peaceful coexistence. Although we are separated by geography and culture, we found common ground in our quest to understand, accept, and celebrate our differences.

As the program drew to a close, we were heavy with the knowledge that the physical distance between our countries would soon separate us. Yet, our emotions were a mix of sadness and hope, for we carried home the spirit of our collective journey.

The SUSI program wasn't just an educational endeavor; it was a pilgrimage of the heart. And as I look back, I am reminded that we, as a global community, hold the power to bridge divides, foster understanding, and create a world where diversity is not just accepted, but cherished.

Reflection by Samaa Hossam (Sky) - 2023 SUSI Student Leader

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Attending Quakers Worship Day by Omar Namiq

On June 25th, my friends Jalal, Danyar, and I made our way to Arch Street to a Quaker church.

Upon entering the church, we were greeted by a lady and a gentleman at the door. We expressed our desire to participate in the worship, and they warmly welcomed us, offering to write our names on stickers and place them on our chests. We gladly accepted and wrote our names, attaching the stickers to our T-shirts.

As I stepped inside, I was immediately struck by the profound silence that filled the room, despite the presence of numerous individuals. I noticed that everyone, including ourselves as newcomers, wore badges with their names written on them. It became apparent that this practice was not exclusive to us, but rather a way of showing respect by addressing individuals by their names when engaging in conversation.

Choosing a seat at the end of the hall, I positioned myself to have a view of all the attendees. Sitting down, I began to observe the people around me and appreciate the beauty of the silence. It was perhaps the first time in my life that I experienced such profound silence in the presence of others.

The room housed a total of 23 people, including the three of us. Among them, nine were female. The majority of attendees were older individuals, but there were also some young people present. As I observed the worship, the predominant feature was silence. There was one young man and woman who remained silent throughout, their eyes closed as if engrossed in a deep communion with their respective gods. I initially believed they were maintaining silence for the entire hour, but then an elderly gentleman slowly stood up and, with a tremor in his voice, shared his contemplation about a passage he had read from Tolstoy. He spoke about how humans never truly die, as only their bodies perish, not their souls. His words captivated the attention of everyone present. After he finished speaking, he sat down, and the silence resumed.

It was during this moment that I realized the significance of Quaker worship. If one feels compelled to share something, they can simply rise and speak, and others will listen attentively. I found this aspect truly beautiful. Here, one has a safe space to voice their thoughts and feelings, knowing they will be heard.

When the clock struck 11:30, a young lady stood up and greeted everyone with a cheerful "Good morning, friends." Suddenly, everyone stood up and reciprocated the greeting, including ourselves, which elicited a lighthearted moment. The young lady then invited anyone who wished to introduce themselves or share something to do so. I raised my hand, stood up, and explained that I come from Kurdistan and that this was my first time attending a Christian church for worship. The entire congregation warmly welcomed me, and my friends, Jalal and Danyar, also took the opportunity to introduce themselves. Subsequently, other individuals stood up, introduced themselves, and one person asked a question, although I couldn't quite hear it clearly.

Following this, we were informed that coffee, tea, and donuts were available if we desired to join the congregation. Without hesitation, we accepted the invitation. While enjoying our donuts, we engaged in conversations with some of the attendees, who proved to be incredibly friendly. They showed genuine interest in Kurdistan, and I found myself immersed in a delightful conversation with them.

Before leaving the church, a lady come and talked with me, she said that we call each other friends, we are “Friends society”. And I asked what about Quakers?, she said “Yes, we Quakers, call each other friends”.

She went on to share with me that they have all agreed upon a set of principles known as SPICES. Intrigued, I asked her to elaborate on what SPICES entails. She explained that it stands for Simplicity, Peace, Integrity, Community, Equality, and Stewardship. Personally, I believe that these principles are fundamental values shared by all religions, although regrettably, people often fail to uphold them.

Seeking further clarification, I asked her what would happen if my inner light led me to a different god than hers. She responded with a lighthearted tone, saying, "Ask three Quakers about God, and you may receive five different answers." We shared a laugh, and she continued by emphasizing that Quakerism grants individuals the freedom to follow their inner light. She expressed that each person's inner light is unique and different from others', and they do not inquire about which god one's inner light guides them towards.

Curiously, I inquired whether a Muslim, or anyone of another religion, could be considered a Quaker. She replied with a jovial tone, "Yes, Hahaha, if they follow their inner light." At that moment, I noticed another young lady who shared with me, "I love the freedom my religion has provided for me."

Eventually, the time came for us to bid farewell. We turned around and said goodbye to everyone before leaving the church. This experience marked my first attendance at a worship outside of the mosque, and it allowed me to witness firsthand how individuals with different religions and beliefs worship their respective gods.

I found solace in the profound silence and felt a genuine connection with the people I encountered.

Reflection by Omar Namiq - 2023 SUSI Student Leader

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

We The People by Ricky Adityanto

We The People: What’s the meaning of becoming “people” in plural community?

By Ricky Adityanto

We the People

The first phrase of the US Constitution that struck my mind. Spontaneously, my mind raised a question: “who is this “the people”?”. History showed us again and again that we always had disputes and arguments on who or what can be considered as “our people”, making a thick line that segregates “us” and “others”. But, could you really choose whether we were born as “us” or “others”? What if you were born as “other” in “us” neighborhood?

Do you see the problem here?

Back to the fundamental meaning of “people” and person

Again, we have to learn from history, from people that sacrificed their lives to redefine the definition of “the people”. From Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, to Nelson Mandela. Did they struggle only for the sake of “being black”? I believe the answer is no.

I believe that the deeper meaning of their struggle, their campaign, was because there were someone’s life and dignity at stake. There were men and women at the verge of death because of segregation. There was a human that died from injustice. At the most fundamental level, they did for human life and dignity.

Wouldn’t you feel angry if you are treated unjustly? Wouldn’t you feel angry if “your people” are treated as “others”, as alien and are stripped from your right as a member of a society? Wouldn’t you feel that all those violate your dignity as a human being?

So, you and I, “us” and “others”, we all have life and dignity as human beings. That line between “your people”, “our people”, and “others” in a society is just a skin-deep definition and categorization but at the core of our soul, we are all human beings. We are “the people” of humanity that have life, dignity, and in turn, rights as a member of society.

“The people” is about we as humans that have life and dignity.

So, what’s the meaning of our “skin”?

White, Black, Asian, Native American, etc. are all “the people”. But, does it mean we are the same? What’s the meaning of our uniqueness then?

All our uniqueness together is another part of the definition of “the people”. There’s no one else in this whole world that can replace you due to all your uniqueness, thought, feelings, talents, and your personal experiences. Thus, if you try to be somebody else, the world will lose the “genuine you”.

On a community scale, each community has its own culture, idealism, vision, way of life, and membership that are so unique they can not be replaced by other community. So, being White, Black, Asian, or Native American is not only about “having skin” but is your culture, your way of life, your name, being your unique self, and your community in society. And being happy with it!

Hence, “the people” is also about being your unique self in society and being proud of it!

Participation of “the people”

All these unique communities together build a society. We are part of society. Since society consists of us with our uniqueness, then we have an important part in our society: giving our unique selves.

This is then the meaning of being White, Black, Asian, or Native American as “the people” of society: being all that’s unique from where you come from, and giving all that uniqueness for the betterment of society. We can think of “the people” as a rainbow, where humanity is the raindrop and the sky with us and our personal background as its color. Being “the people” is all about celebrating humanity with its all colors and giving all those colors to the world.

Come to think of it, “the people” really have a beautiful meaning, isn’t it?

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Robert B. Slocum on Bonhoeffer’s Theology of Resistance

The Winter issue 58.1 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days. In this issue, we are featuring Robert B. Slocum's "Thrown into God’s Arms: The Sacrificial Grace of Dietrich Bonhoeffer." A full-text version of his article is available on Project Muse and be accessed HERE.

Robert B. Slocum (Episcopal Church) has been an assistant professor in the University of Kentucky's College of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine (voluntary faculty), in Lexington, KY, since 2017, and a Narrative Medicine Facility program coordinator for the University of KY HealthCare since 2015. He teaches an elective course for fourth-year medical students on the narrative basis for patient care and resilient practice. He taught at St. Catharine College, Springfield, KY, 2008–16, and was dean of its School of Arts & Sciences, 2011–13. He has also taught theology and religion at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI; Mount Mary College (now University), Milwaukee; Carthage College, Kenosha, WI; and Nashotah (WI) House Seminary, During 1986–2002 and 2007–09, he served in ordained ministry positions and as a part-time chaplain, 1993–98, in a Veterans Administration Medical Center in Milwaukee. He was a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Air Force, 1978–83. His B.A. and J.D. are from Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; his M.Div. from Nashotah House Seminary; his D. Min. from the University of the South, Sewanee, TN; and his Ph.D. (1997) in systematic theology from Marquette University. He has authored four books, most recently The Anglican Imagination: Portraits and Sketches of Modern Anglican Theologians (Ashgate, 2015; Routledge, 2016), and edited or co-edited ten others, including Discovering Common Mission: Lutherans and Episcopalians Together (with Don S. Armentrout; Church Publishing, 2003). His nearly forty articles have appeared in theological or medical journals and as book chapters, and he has made presentations at more than two dozen theological and medical conferences. He is married to Victoria Slocum and has three adult children.


In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

Identifying with the oppressed in both the U.S. and Germany, Dietrich Bonhoeffer said the church of Christ lives in all people, beyond all national, political, social, and racial boundaries. He offered an ecumenical vision of the Christian church that greatly transcends the Christian nationalism of National Socialism in Germany; he saw that God’s love for the world and incarnational Christian spirituality can be expressed through political action and active resistance.

How did you get interested in the topic?

I was fascinated by Bonhoeffer's heartfelt devotion and academic achievement that provided the foundation for his unflinching Christian witness, resistance, and sacrifice. He spoke up and acted with great courage at a time when many Christians in his country looked the other way in the face of great evil. The story of his willingness to apply his faith in resistance and direct action against Nazi tyranny also provided an effective example and good material for discussion in undergraduate courses I taught on topics such as Christ and culture, quests for God, and applied ethics.

Your article poses a stark contrast between the Confessing church movement associated with Bonhoeffer and the dominant German Christian movement that became co-opted by Nazi ideology. Do you see parallels in the world today and how best can Bonhoeffer speak to the challenges we face?

Like us, Bonhoeffer lived in a time of great conflict and abuse of vulnerable minorities who were seen as outsiders by the powerful. The response of German Christians to the threats of National Socialism generally ranged from anemic to complacent to complicit;  Bonhoeffer's frustration was palpable.  He expressed faith through prayer and justice instead of powerful religious organizations and sought a future form of the church that might be unexpected—nonreligious in a conventional sense, but able to convert and transform. He consistently sacrificed his own safety to resist the oppression of the German people, while expressing and living the unity of faith and action in the world through sacrificial grace. 

What is your next project?

I am continuing to explore perspectives on "war and faith" from the mid-19th century to the present. I define "war" broadly to include intense struggles outside the context of declared wars such as civil rights and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, as well as declared wars. I believe that sometimes in the worst situations, we reach out for the divine most earnestly, stating our beliefs, understandings, and sources of meaning most clearly. I am currently beginning to research the writings and witness of Dorothy Day.

Article Abstract:

Dietrich Bonhoeffer encountered Aryan nationalism and racism with sacrificial grace and Christian opposition. One of the first and the very few to speak out against the Nazis and to follow through with active resistance, he resisted Nazi intrusions into the life of the German church and the impact of Nazi bigotry on Jews and others excluded from full participation in German society. During his time in New York City at Union Theological Seminary and at Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, he witnessed the impact of racism in the United States. Identifying with the oppressed in both the U.S. and Germany, he said the church of Christ lives in all people, beyond all national, political, social, and racial boundaries. Offering an ecumenical vision of the Christian church that greatly transcends the Christian nationalism of National Socialism, he moved from academic and pastoral ministry to direct action against Nazi oppression by smuggling Jews out of Germany, using ecumenical contexts to spread word about resistance to the Nazis, and seeking the overthrow of Nazi leadership. Self-sacrificing in his devotion to public activism, he saw that God’s love for the world and incarnational Christian spirituality could be expressed through political action. He expressed faith through prayer and justice, not in powerful religious organizations, and sought a future form of the church that might be unexpected—nonreligious in a conventional sense, but able to convert and transform. He consistently sacrificed his own safety to resist the oppression of the German people, while expressing the unity of faith and action in the world through sacrificial grace. 

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

A SUSI Summer 2022 Reflection: Ricky Adityanto

What is human?

This was my simple question when I flew to the USA for my SUSI Summer 2022 program. As a multilevel minority in Indonesia (Catholic, Chinese mixed descent, queer) I experienced many discriminations in my life. I tried my best to contribute to society as a good person so people won’t question my identity as a problem anymore just like Gus Dur (the 4th Indonesia’s president) said: “If you are a good person, no one will ask your religion”.

But still, I questioned my identity at that time. Yes, I believe that God created us differently and each one’s unique identity is a hidden gem. But in reality, those differences are often seen as problems. What if I, for once, proudly show my identity without any social pressure? Would I grasp a deeper meaning of being a human?

Who is human?

“We the people”. That part of the preamble of the US Constitution was one of the major points of my reflection. Who are the people? We are all! No matter your religion, skin color, gender, etc. We are all the people. We are all human!

I was really touched when for once I could be proud and accepted for my identity during the SUSI Summer program. And in turn, I was blessed to know my friends’ unique identity in SUSI that I never met before in Indonesia. Unknowingly, I become blessed precisely because of the unique identity that molds me into a unique person. I was there, I met them, had conversations with them, and helped them as a unique color called “me”. No one can replace me and my color.

At that point, I understood that being human is being me with all my identity, and giving that “me” as a whole in my relation with others. And having identity means having struggle. So, I must be open to the others’ and my own struggle in my relation.

Why human?

"If the church stays silent, who will speak for the poor and discriminated?”. This speech I got in Bethel Church, Philadelphia, still gives me goosebumps now and that is also the answer to the next question: why human?

We are all blessed through our unique identity and struggle! Our identity and struggle shape us as a person with our own lessons that we learned from our struggles. And our mission in this world is simply to be truthful to ourselves, to our “color”, learn from the struggle, and share what we’ve learned from the struggle to inspire a better society. Be a unique blessing for others that can’t be replaced.

So, here I am, sharing with you what I’ve learned so far. If I stay silent, who will speak for people who are in the same identity group as me?

How to be human?

I can’t mention one by one all the beautiful quotes I got from all the beautiful-hearted people I met during SUSI. I can say that I met big people with even bigger hearts there. But, one important thing I can say is they showed me how to be human: embrace the identity, and the struggle, and share and care for others.

And they showed how to do it in the simplest way: through friendship. Through friendship, we open to others’ struggles, we try to understand and respect others’ identities, and we learn how to share and care with kindness. We also respect ourselves by staying true to our identity and giving it as a gift to others. And together, we paint this world with our combined colors, creating new colors that we never thought could exist before. This is exactly what dialogue is all about.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

A SUSI 2022 Alumni Story: Arshad Khan

"Growing up in a traditional business-oriented joint family in a drought-prone district of Telangana, I have been perceiving what it takes for a multicultural society to exist in the present-day world.

I graduated from St.Mary`s College with BBA. Since the day I moved to Hyderabad for my higher education, I have always been seeking a platform to nurture my idea of multicultural coexistence, and that's where I found Rubaroo NGO based out of the city who is relentlessly working on education and human rights advocacy. A 3-day workshop on interfaith included playful activities on values, perceptions, conflict management, and the social action project we conducted in a women`s degree college in Mahabubnagar has brought me a proper understanding of how to resolve conflicts among smaller groups and avoidance of communal violence.

Over time, Rubaroo NGO nominated a few youth champions of the previous workshop for a US exchange program called SUSI, Study of the U.S. Institutes (SUSIs) for Scholars.

Among them, I was selected for the cohort Religious Freedom and Pluralism. Unfortunately, the pandemic began the year in which we were supposed to fly to the United States for the 6 weeks of the study tour. So we had to go through the sessions virtually for two months and the community action project in further time and then eventually things were getting better. Finally, in Oct 2022, we flew to the United States for a 10-day capstone program on religious freedom and pluralism which included round table meetings on democracy, lectures by Temple university professors on Religious freedom, walking around historical monuments and worship places in Philadelphia city, an interfaith community center in Baltimore and the Washington DC.

My whole journey at SUSI consisted of challenges and surprises but I must say it's truly a remarkable and worthwhile experience on the whole as meeting new people beyond the border with similar thought processes has truly nurtured my idea of multi-cultural coexistence."


- Arshad Khan, SUSI Alumni 2021/2022

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

A SUSI 2018 Alumni Story: Amira AbdelTawab

“Be the change you want to see in the world."

- Mahatma Gandhi

Although the chaos I have been through now in all aspects of my life, I still remember when I was 16 years old, I was dreaming of having a good future and becoming a successful young woman, and changing the world when I grew up. It wouldn’t happen until I traveled to study abroad not in any country, but only in the United States of America.

I was obsessed with traveling to the USA, it was my biggest dream since my childhood to be in the wonderland living the American dream, so during my university year, I studied hard and participated in many student and community service activities. After this hard work, I was lucky enough to receive one of the most difficult scholarships from the U.S. embassy in Cairo and the Department of State. My dream came true and I finally traveled to my dream land, or as I thought at this time.

When I was in the USA I studied for a few short weeks with the Dialogue Institute at Temple University, but it was a turning point in my life. I studied religious pluralism, diversity of cultures, and policy, and learned more about American society close up. I studied Islam from a Western perspective, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. I discovered new religions that I have never heard about before - like the Quakers - and I lived with them in the heart of the Philadelphia forest to study more about them and their leader William Penn, and how they made a significant impact in the foundation of the principles of the American constitution and the American policy.

This heavy experience shifted me from a closed-minded person to a person who is always eager to learn about themself, not only from the difficult experiences of life, but also from others, and let me accept not only different ideas than mine but also the ideas that are completely against mine.

Now I believe in humanity and believe that everyone in this life has their own journey in which they wake up to themself, then to their shadow, and then to their potential. I have to respect every human being on the earth - as life is not a straight path - it is a trial and error and trying different things by figuring yourself out who you are and who you are not.

And finally, I accept the fact that I can change the world by changing myself, and by being kind to myself and everyone.


This blog post was written by a Study of the U.S. Institutes (SUSI) Alumni - a program that the Dialogue Institute implements in partnership with Meridian International and the United States State Department. To find out more about the SUSI program, click here.


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Gabrielle Thomas on Receptive Ecumenism

The Fall issue 57:4 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days. In this issue, we are featuring Gabrielle Rachel Thomas's "The Gift of Power in Methodism: Learning from Women’s Experiences of Working in Diverse Churches in England through Receptive Ecumenism."

Gabrielle Thomas is an Assistant Professor of Early Christianity and Anglican Studies, at the Candler School of Theology, Emory University, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., and is a member of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Theological Reflection Group in the U.K.  She earned her Ph.D. in Historical Theology from the University of Nottingham in Nottingham, U.K. in 2017.

In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

My article identifies possible ecclesial learning by using receptive ecumenism to explore women’s experiences of working in diverse churches in England. I examine a Methodist approach to power and use it to critique current practices across diverse Christian traditions in England, providing the potential for churches to transform the way that power is distributed, especially with respect to women flourishing in leadership roles.

How does your article help us better understand Receptive Ecumenism?

Simply put, receptive ecumenism asks, “What do we need to learn from another Christian tradition to help us address some of the wounds and weaknesses in our own?” My contribution puts Receptive Ecumenism to the test with a practical example of women who follow the way of receptive ecumenism to explore their experiences of working in churches in England, with a view to identifying areas for potential ecclesial learning.

How did you get interested in the topic?

I have long been committed to Christian unity. Receptive Ecumenism is a fresh way into the conversation. With respect to the project I developed on exploring women’s experiences– I am ordained in the Church of England and am interested in ministry from the perspective of a researcher but also as a practitioner.

What is your next project?

My next project explores a theology of the Devil bringing into conversation the perspective and experience of diverse traditions such as Pentecostal, Anglican, Catholic, and Orthodox.


Article Abstract:

Global attention to receptive ecumenism has grown in recent years, prompting ecumenical theologians to ask, “What do we need to learn from another Christian tradition to help us address some of the wounds and weaknesses in our own?” Hitherto, much of the published work on receptive ecumenism has focused on its place in the formal ecumenical movement with little attention directed toward the grassroots. This contribution is a case study that identifies possible ecclesial learning by using receptive ecumenism to explore women’s experiences of working in diverse churches in England. It focuses on a particular example emerging from the broader research, during which Baptist women identified how the distribution of power in their churches can inhibit women’s flourishing, particularly in ministerial roles. Following the way of receptive ecumenism, after outlining the research context, I examine gifts shared by Methodist participants who spoke of positive structures of power. These, I argue, critique current practices, not only in the Baptist tradition but across diverse Christian traditions in England, providing the potential for churches to transform the way that power is distributed, especially with respect to women’s flourishing in leadership roles.

The full text article can be accessed via Project Muse HERE.  


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Book Review: Blacks and Jews in America: An Invitation to Dialogue

Terrance L. Johnson and Jacques Berlinerblau, Blacks and Jews in America: An Invitation to Dialogue. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2022. Pp. 224. $26.95.

Volume 57, Number 4, Fall 2022 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies features a book review of Blacks and Jews in America: An Invitation to Dialogue. The review is written by Dialogue Institute executive director, David M. Krueger. The book has been useful in informing the organization’s various programs on Black-Jewish Dialogue and Understanding. In collaboration with the American Jewish Committee, the Dialogue Institute will be hosting history and dialogue programming in March and April, 2023. We are actively recruiting a spring 2023 intern to assist with research and curriculum development. Position description can be found HERE.

Below is an excerpt of the review, and the rest can be read HERE on Project Muse. The full text PDF is open access until February 1, 2023.

Among minority groups in the U.S., Blacks and Jews have had a unique relationship, often characterized by collaborations in music, sports, and the common pursuit of civil rights. One of the most iconic images of this relationship is the image of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel marching side-by-side during the American civil rights movements of the 1960’s. However, the relationships between Blacks and Jews have also been fraught with disagreements over questions of Israel/Palestine policy and commitment to racial justice. Drawing on their experience teaching a class on Blacks and Jews in America at Georgetown University, the authors take a fresh look at the complicated and contested history of the relations between these two groups, identifying the key obstacles to constructive dialogue.

In the early-to-mid-twentieth century, Jews and Blacks lived near one another in many urban areas, but this is less common today. Due to white flight in the latter half of the twentieth century, neighborhoods and schools are highly segregated along lines of race and class. As the authors observe, Jews and Blacks today tend to see one another as strangers. As a result, there are few face-to-face encounters that happen organically. Therefore, they suggest, dialogue and relationship-building must be intentional if they are to happen. To engage in this difficult work, the authors identify several key issues that must be taken into consideration. Foremost is the power asymmetry between the two groups. In political collaborations between Blacks and Jews in the twentieth century, white Jews have typically held the financial and economic power, an imbalance that has often distorted the relationship and led to misunderstandings about motivations. According to the authors, a shared commitment to a political vision that advances structural equality for African Americans must be the starting point for meaningful dialogue between Blacks and Jews.

The establishment of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in 1909 is often cited as the highpoint of the “Grand Alliance” of Black-Jewish relations. During this period, the groups shared concerns about legalized racial discrimination and segregation. In time, immigrant Jews were better able to assimilate and become recognized as white—a privilege not afforded to African Americans, including Black Jews, who number more than a half million in the U.S. However, while many Jews do benefit from white privilege, they recognize that their status as white in American society is liminal. According to the authors, sincere dialogue between Blacks and Jews (including nonwhite Jews) must address the complexities of race in America.

To read more, click HERE to download a PDF from Project Muse.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

SUSI Summer 2022 Religious Freedom and Pluralism in the United States

This summer the Dialogue Institute hosted 18 students from Iraq, India, Indonesia, Egypt, and Lebanon for another SUSI Religious Freedom program.

Students engaged in workshops, lectures, and team-building exercises, and were able to explore the city of Philadelphia and the mid-Atlantic region for 4.5 weeks.


Participants learned about issues of diversity, pluralism, and American culture in the Philadelphia area as well as in the greater United States. They learned from religious practitioners, law professionals, academics, civil servants, and community members throughout their visit. Our participants were able to visit Washington, D.C., Virginia, and Lancaster, PA in addition to their Philadelphia stay.

Some highlights of their program included a visit to the Amish in Lancaster, PA, celebrating Eid at the ADAMS center with DI board member Abdullah Antepli, meeting the Abrahamic house fellows in Washington, D.C., and being able to explore Philadelphia in the busy summertime. We were lucky enough to have several DI board and community members with us this summer to mentor, teach, and dialogue with our students. The DI gives a special thanks to Majid Alsayegh, Gity Banan- Etemad, Kay Yu, Nancy Krody, Dr. Rev. Mark Tyler, Abdullah Antepli, Rebecca Mays, and Sean Chambers who supported our students and made this year such a success. We also appreciate all of our volunteers and SUSI staff for all of their hard work.

Our SUSI program closed with the students presenting their community action plans which they created during their programing. Participant community action projects ranged from integrating pluralism in their home universities to hosting workshops for their own NGOs back home. It was clear our 2022 cohort learned a lot from their SUSI experience and while we were sad to see them go back home, we are excited to see all they will do in their home communities.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Ellen Charry on Van Buren's Theology of Jewish-Christian Reality

Dr. Ellen Charry, Margaret W. Harmon Professor of Systematic Theology Emerita at Princeton Theological Seminary.

Summer issue 57.3 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days. This issue, we are featuring “Paul M. van Buren's A Theology of the Jewish-Christian Reality” by Dr. Ellen Charry, Margaret W. Harmon Professor of Systematic Theology Emerita at Princeton Theological Seminary. Dr. Charry has taught interfaith theology and historical and systematic theology. She earned her PhD from Temple University and is a former student of Prof. Leonard Swidler, co-founder of the J.E.S.

In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

The argument of my JES article on my beloved mentor, Paul M. van Buren, is that he is far more radical than associating him with the “death of God” movement recognized. He never understood himself as proclaiming “the death of God,” but as recognizing that classical Greek metaphysics could not account for history that is essential for rendering Christianity understandable.

How does your article help us better understand Jewish-Christian relations?

Paul’s radicality lies in his recognition that the Jewish No to Christ is a Yes to God that Christians need to take seriously. He was the first Christian theologian not only to recognize this but to work it through Christian theology, particularly through Christology that remained a central concern throughout his career. His three-volume Theology of the Jewish-Christian Reality (1980-88) remains the premier Christian theology proposing how Christian contempt for Judaism can dissolve into companioning Judaism in its walk with God alongside Christianity.

How did you get interested in the topic?

I have engaged this topic since I was three years old. It became the intellectual core of my life struggle.

What is your next project?

My current project is Who is the Israel of God? It is a peace proposal for putting down the mutual enmity that characterizes two thousand years of the Christian-Jewish relationship.

Article Abstract:

Paul M. van Buren was the first Christian theologian to argue that the Jewish No to Jesus is a Yes to God. He offered Christians and Jews fresh ways of understanding both themselves and the other. His trilogy, A Theology of the Jewish-Christian Reality, begins by honoring God's enduring covenant with the Jews and then proceeds to identify false turns both traditions have taken in their walks with God. He called both to critical self-reflection in theological conversation with the other's identity and missteps. He turned the church from being against the Jews to being alongside them and called Jews to return to God's covenant with them in order that Christian rethinking not be theologically empty.

The full text article can be accessed via Project Muse HERE.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Malahat Veliyeva: A Dialogue Institute Interview

Malahat Veliyeva is an alumna of the Dialogue Institute’s 2019 Study of the U.S. Institutes for Scholars program. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of English Lexicology and Stylistics at the Azerbaijan University of Languages where she teaches American studies and multiculturalism. Professor Veliyeva was interviewed by Ivanessa Arostegui, a Temple University student pursuing a PhD in religious studies.


Ivanessa Arostegui: Good evening Malahat. It's evening, where you're at, and we are so, so happy that you're going to be able to spend some time with us and talk about how Islam has impacted your life and how you see it within Azerbaijan, going to talk to us about a very specific holiday, and we really appreciate your time here with us this morning. So I want to begin by having you introduce yourself.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Thank you very much. I'm also delighted to talk to you this evening, it is evening in Baku good morning to you in Philadelphia, I am Malahat Veliyeva I teach American studies and multiculturalism at Azerbaijan University of Languages, I am a SUSI scholar, 2019. And I had a wonderful experience at Temple University, specifically at the Dialogue Institute with our colleagues with Len Swidler, David Krueger, and Rebecca Mays. These are wonderful people who made our SUSI journey very interesting and useful for us and more informative, educative for us.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Great. Thank you so much for introducing yourself and explaining your connection to the Dialogue Institute. We're so happy that you had a great experience here. It's probably a very different city than where you live, and you know, I'm glad that you were able to make so many connections and, hopefully, you still feel connected to the Institute and we're so happy that you're able to be here with us today.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Yes, I am yes, thank you very much for the question. And I'm still connected with our colleagues at the Dialogue Institute now via email. We contact with each other, we send articles to the Journal of Ecumenical Studies, and at the same time we exchange our views on different events happening in the world, we still keep in touch with each other and also, I would like to mention very valuable ideas very valuable experience that I bought about religious pluralism and studies of American society. When I was a SUSI scholar at Temple University, we visited different states, we visited Arizona, we visited the Grand Canyon. So it was an unforgettable experience actually.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yeah it sounds amazing because you were able to meet all these people, but also see the United States and have these very unique experiences and all of these different sites, you know historical sites and sacred sites and I'm sure that that really kind of gave you a well-rounded understanding it's- it's one thing to meet people it's another thing to go physically and see places experience and walk and yeah so wonderful Okay, so you are Muslim correct.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Yes, I am.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Okay, so now we're going to transition and talk about Islam and your experience with your religion, so my first question is just how does Islam affect the way that you see the universe, or the world or other people like your perspective and your lens like how does that focus things in for you in your life.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Thank you very much. Islam actually has shaped my views on the universe our planet and other people, since I realized the essence of this religion. I understand that the whole universe, including all living beings, are created by God. Everyone has a mission in this world, some people understand it, some people don't that's why we have positive and negative people, so in my understanding. And this life is a trial for everyone, according to Islam it's an examination, whether we pass or do not pass this examination will be known in the other world when we change the way we exist. You know people work they do their best to achieve something to make fortune sometimes to get some financial benefits, but when we return to God, we will not be asked how much we have accumulated how much fortune we have made, we will be asked how much we give away, so this is the essence of life, this is my philosophy of life, according to Islam.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: That's beautiful yeah so it affects everything your whole complete understanding of everything in the universe and you're like you said mission, while you're here while you're alive, which is it sounds like rooted in generosity and kindness and compassion and giving right because, for you everything in the physical material world is nothing really. When we return back to God.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Yes, we will all return back to God and we should all realize it and whatever surrounds us our life, the planet, universe, people, all these things are you know given for us like examination. Like trial for us in this world. So that to give a kind of report in another world about our actions about our deeds like this.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yeah perfect, so I guess, we can segway into actions and deeds behaviors, how do you feel Islam kind of shapes the way that you make decisions in your life or how you interact with others.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: It has enormous impact on my life my actions, my behaviors are determined by my religious views. Also, my personality. I am a woman and a woman in Islam, should be educated in order to educate her children the future generation to educate others. A woman is not only in miserable creature deprived of her human rights under hijab as in some Muslim countries, women are very active citizens in Azerbaijani society, of course, we also have some gender problems. So in faraway regions of Azerbaijan, there are some gender problems.

Infringement of women's rights, etc, but overall in our society, women are very independent. They're everywhere they're in politics, they're in education and spheres of education, they are in business. Everywhere, and so women in our society, women should be educated everyone - everyone tries to educate, especially girls in the families, because. In the future, they might face a lot of problems, a lot of difficulties like social problems, divorce or any other problems, so that if they have a good education they might somehow support themselves support their family so.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: That's wonderful yeah, I mean I think that's sometimes people have a lot of negative associations or stereotypes or ideas of other religions or other places that they're ignorant of, and unfortunately they just fill in you know the gaps or the ignorance and their knowledge by something they saw one time or an idea that they might have by somebody else that doesn't know anything about this country or this religion. But I am glad that you mentioned that it's a complicated spectrum in terms of the situation for women, but from your experience and in the cities that you grew up in and that you lived in you saw a type of Islam, where women are you know, prized within their society, as you know, very important to the family and Islam in general I think also encourages so much the search for knowledge, and so, women are also a part of that and becoming educated. And it wouldn't be fair to have that negative stereotype that sometimes comes in.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: Education, women's education is great priority in our society, and everyone strives for that everyone tries to give education to their daughters, especially in families with daughters, you know because I think education, Dostoevsky said that beauty will save the world, but I think education will save the world, you know, because even Islam, even to the studies of Islam, we should approach it from the point of view of you know, education. If we study Islam as it is, if we study real Islam if we investigate Qur’an we will see that it is, it is quite you know- more than religion, and there are a lot of answers to our questions there, we can find, although it was written many, many centuries ago, yeah.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yeah, great so then my other question in relation to Islam is about religious practices that you feel might bring the community together or might build bridges of connection or communication. I don't know if you want to share some of those practices with us today.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: So religious practice, for example in Azerbaijan, there are two contrasting Muslim directions like Shi’ism and Sunnism and they successfully coexist in Azerbaijan and even they complete each other, like there is a tradition every Friday both Shi’is and Sunnis, they come to the mosque, and they pray together and after praying they just shake their hands greet each other, and they are very friendly with each other, you know. But what can we see in in Middle Eastern countries in other countries, so where Shi’ism and Sunnism are confronting with each other, and they are competing for leadership in Islam and so these things are. I think beyond our understanding. So these are two directions in Islam, and they should coexist together and we are all people we are all equal in front of God we are the same for God, you know, yeah and people should understand it, these religious practices. Then we have Ramadan and during the month of Ramadan. So it is fasting you know Muslims all over the world, they do fasting, and they eat at the same time, they just do the same rituals and it's somehow you know unites people all over the world, especially the Muslims all over the world. They understand what do the poor people experience what do hungry people experience and they try to be more merciful. Ramadan teaches people to understand each other to be more you know sympathetic to each other yeah and I think this this tradition, this religious practice should continue and the people, especially the Muslims all over the world, they should preserve these traditions and practices.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yeah yeah it sounds like you believe that these practices connect - like you said, not just local Muslims or Muslims within one country but it's a whole global community of Muslims of brothers and sisters in the whole world that can come together with these practices. And that can help them connect to everyone, like you said, even people that might not be in that similar situation if they were blessed monetarily or with certain blessings within their family, they also have time to contemplate and to think of those that have less than they do. So that you really think that this is something that connects Islam, not just to the Islamic community, the global Islamic community, but to humanity to all humans and the suffering of everyone. Alright perfect so now we're going to get to a particular holiday that you're going to talk to us about so which holiday, are you going to talk to us about.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: I would like to talk about Eid Al Adha, it is called Gurban holiday, feast of sacrifice, yes, it is one of the grandiose holidays in the Islamic world and, as most of the important surmises of Islam Gurban, Eid Al Adha is demanded by Qur’an.This holiday is a part of Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca and the holiday of sacrifice is usually celebrated on the 10th day of the 12th month of the Muslim calendar Dhū al-Ḥijjah and this holiday, it is also a good practice for uniting Muslims all over the world, it is peculiar only to Islam. So I would like to talk a little bit about the history of this holiday it's related to the Prophet Abraham who brought his son as a sacrifice to God he wanted to kill his son as a sacrifice to God and at this moment he saw he got a message from God to cut the sheep. To cut the ship, and here we can see Islam how Islam prohibits any kind of human sacrifice how human life is valuable is important in this world, especially for God and God here recommends him to sacrifice the animal, instead of human, instead of his son. To give the holiday more respect it was determined to celebrate it once on the 10th day of Dhū al-Ḥijjah, as I said, and I would like to say some quotation from Qur’an from the Surah 5 Ayat 97: “Allah determined Bayt al-Haram, sacred house, Kabb’ah, the sacred month, tied and untied neck with and without signs on their necks, sacrifices brought to Kabb’ah to be a way to put into order the lives, religious and world affairs of the people.” It is the quotation from Qur’an about Eid Al Adha, and it is possible to bring the sacrifice for the realization of some wish and so we have different kinds of religious ceremonies. But the most important ceremony, the most essential one is cutting sheep and giving away to the poor to the needy families to hungry people and see the most interesting thing about this holiday the unique fact about this holiday is that prophet Abraham brought his son to kill as a sacrifice to Allah but Allah offered him to cut the sheep and it is, it is you know very, how to say, important message from Allah to people - so don't kill yourselves don't kill each other, because human life is very important. You know, and when people cut the sheep and give out meat and give it like gifts like mutton, it teaches people to understand that they should be helpful to each other, they should help each other in difficult situations and also if the Muslim knows that his neighbor or his relative or someone else's hungry and he shouldn't be indifferent to this, he should support them, he should help, and so this holiday this day, Eid Al Adha is like you know attribute of Muslim unity not only Muslims, so we cut sheep and we give away even to people who are not Muslims who were just people from other religions, like Christianity Jewish etc yeah. And I think it is - being merciful, being generous is very important.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yes, great, so that is very beautiful, I grew up practicing Christianity and there's no form of animal sacrifice there's sometimes in Christianity forms of like self-sacrifice where you sacrifice maybe something that might be very dear to you let's say maybe during a particular time period, and we do something that for yourself is kind of painful like maybe you don't use your computer or your technology and that's going to hurt you a little bit because you're so used to going on your computer using your phone and so forms of self-sacrifice there isn't forms of animal sacrifice really in Christianity, but this is, this is a very unique practice in Islam and like you said ties very specifically back to Abraham who is so important within Islam and within all of the Abrahamic traditions. Is this holiday, or is this practice, do you feel that in any way it brings together a larger history for Muslims, for them to like connect with the larger history of who they are in some way, do you feel it plays that role or?

 

Malahat Veliyeva: You know, yes it comes from history and at the same time, Muslims all over the world, they try to. To preserve this history and to connect it with modern life to connect it with modernity, because many years have passed, many centuries have passed since Islam has been established on this planet, on our planet. So it makes you know people, especially Muslims, how to say, merciful and grateful to God.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Beautiful. Okay, and our last question about this holiday. How do you feel about practicing this particular holiday, or being a part of the Feast of the sacrifice for you or from some around the world, how do you feel that that connects Muslims to God.

 

Malahat Veliyeva: This story passes from generation to generation, and it is told in mosques, it is spreading on social networking sites as well. For the young generation to be well informed about it, and every year we celebrate the holiday as remembrance, to the prophet of Abraham and his son Ishmael who was saved by God let's say who was you know given us a gift to his father again like this yeah and I think it's our duty to preserve this holiday and to celebrate it every year and to pass this information from generation to generation- so our holy book Qur’an exists, and I hope it will exist forever. For future generations for humanity to learn how to live to understand the philosophy of life to understand how to become a good human, a real human being.

 

Ivanessa Arostegui: Yes, so important right to have these holidays, these rituals that connect to a really long line of people and ancestors that have experienced the power of God and to continue to walk in faith and to continue to preserve that history, that has been there for so long and to allow it to effect now, right the present, how you said how we decide to live with others, and what we decide to highlight and prioritize and so very beautiful, thank you so much, we really, really appreciate your time with us this morning.

 

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Kashshaf Ghani on Piety, Dialogue, and Sufi Devotionalism

Spring issue 57.2 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days. This issue, we are featuring “Creating Space for Piety and Dialogue: North American Sufi Devotionalism” by Dr. Kashshaf Ghani, assistant professor of history at Nalanda University in Rajgir, Bihar, India. Dr. Ghani spent the summer of 2018 with the Dialogue Institute as a Study of the U.S. Institutes (SUSI) scholar studying religious pluralism in the United States. The genesis of the article began with a visit to Bawa Muhaiyaddeen Fellowship, a Sufi mosque in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

ABSTRACT: The following essay studies the early history of Islamic devotional tradition in the U.S. particularly through the rise of the Sufi movements. I intend to approach this study primarily from the vantage point of historical origins and development of Sufi groups in the U.S. from the late-20th century. This approach will be grounded on the perspective of Sufism as a minority faith practice and its various manifestations in the U.S – spiritual practices, devotional exercises, artistic expression, and cross-cultural dialogue. Sufism being one such manifestation, its career in the U.S. can be identified along multiple positions of ideology and practice – drawing from normative Islamic teaching and morals, following an eclectic and universalist approach, and transplantation of Sufi practices from parent societies, like South Asia and Africa. The essay will conclude by focusing on the dimension of transnationalism through the career of a South Asian Sufi master in Philadelphia – Bawa Muhaiyadeen.

The full text article can be accessed via Project Muse HERE.

The 2018 SUSI Scholars visited the Bawa Muhaiyaddeen Fellowship, a Sufi Muslim community, in the Overbrook section of Philadelphia.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home